With no data and only a hunch that a conspiracy was afoot, columnist takes issue with opinion poll
03 June 2024 - 14:22
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
In the piece, Steinberg tells us he is “wondering hard enough” to raise his concerns that pollsters “are aware that their findings could affect the outcome of the election”, He casts doubt on most polls but concludes that polls — including my own — might be right, in which case “I will be eating humble pie”.
Steinberg takes issue with the poll I conducted, which — “a little odd” according to Steinberg — had the ANC at 39%. Apparently, I had concocted the results so “the work its funders paid for sang a hopeful tune” — a rather snippy little insult usually beneath him.
He enthusiastically repeats Mark Orkin’s re-percentaging of the 39% I predicted to what “should have had the ANC at 47%”. I trust that now that my 39% proved a sliver off the 40.2% that the ANC did receive, both Steinberg and Orkin will be served a very large slice of humble pie and film themselves eating it.
With no data and only a hunch that a pollster conspiracy was afoot, the old adage is an appropriate warning to both: only fools rush in.
Prof David Everatt Wits School of Governance
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments toletters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Jonny Steinberg gets it very wrong
With no data and only a hunch that a conspiracy was afoot, columnist takes issue with opinion poll
I refer to Jonny Steinberg’s uncharacteristically mealy-mouthed article on polling (“Devil is in the details in divisive predictions about election,” April 19).
In the piece, Steinberg tells us he is “wondering hard enough” to raise his concerns that pollsters “are aware that their findings could affect the outcome of the election”, He casts doubt on most polls but concludes that polls — including my own — might be right, in which case “I will be eating humble pie”.
Steinberg takes issue with the poll I conducted, which — “a little odd” according to Steinberg — had the ANC at 39%. Apparently, I had concocted the results so “the work its funders paid for sang a hopeful tune” — a rather snippy little insult usually beneath him.
He enthusiastically repeats Mark Orkin’s re-percentaging of the 39% I predicted to what “should have had the ANC at 47%”. I trust that now that my 39% proved a sliver off the 40.2% that the ANC did receive, both Steinberg and Orkin will be served a very large slice of humble pie and film themselves eating it.
With no data and only a hunch that a pollster conspiracy was afoot, the old adage is an appropriate warning to both: only fools rush in.
Prof David Everatt
Wits School of Governance
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
WATCH: 2024 election results announcement
AUBREY MATSHIQI: ANC decline is a chance to correct the errors and folly of past 30 years
Welcome to a new coalition country: political horse-trading gets under way
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.