Gauteng government’s move to take over adoption services raises concerns

The Gauteng social development department plans to take over adoption services from nonprofit organisations. This is despite a 2022 high court ruling, which the department is appealing, that found the conduct of the department’s social workers “unlawful” and the national adoption guidelines unconstitutional.

In a memo sent in April to child protection organisations in Gauteng, the department says it will no longer be paying salaries for adoption social workers at nonprofit organisations.

“Designated [child protection organisations] charge a fee and therefore are able to financially support and sustain the [adoption] service,” it said.

According to the memo, the department has 58 social workers providing adoption services and is therefore “in a position to offer adoption services free of charge”.

In response to our questions, department spokesperson Themba Gadebe said “some organisations … sell children for an arm and a leg to international couples or individuals”.

Gadebe said the state would provide the service free “to ensure that children are not sold and the service [would] not be commercialised”, and to prevent “human trafficking”.

However, a director of a child protection and adoption organisation in Gauteng, speaking to GroundUp anonymously for fear of repercussions, said that fears about organisations “commercialising” adoption services were overblown.

Adoption services are governed by the Children’s Act, which makes provision for both the government and nonprofit organisations to provide adoption services.

The Children’s Act permits fees to be charged for adoption services. The fees are highly regulated, said the director. For intercountry adoptions, for example, an organisation is not allowed to charge more than R35,000. This limit has been in place since 2012 and has not gone up, while the costs incurred by the organisation have increased with inflation.

Fees go towards paying salaries and administrative costs and, because the services are provided by nonprofit organisations, any surplus funds go back into the organisation.

Our source added that some of the legal work involved in adoption was highly specialised, and raised doubts about the department’s ability to provide an efficient adoption service that met the legal requirements.

Gadebe told GroundUp that the department was mandated by the Children’s Act to provide adoption services and was “capacitating itself” to take over adoption services.

Court ruling against the department

In 2022, the Gauteng High Court ruled that the national adoption guidelines, which had been implemented in Gauteng and several provinces, were “unconstitutional”. The case was brought by two single women, represented by Women’s Legal Centre, who said they had been harassed and unfairly treated by the Gauteng social development department.

The national and provincial social development departments have since appealed the ruling, and the appeal is yet to be heard.

Among the women’s complaints were that the social workers refused to process their adoptions for “cultural reasons” and that the social workers threatened to inform their parents of their pregnancies, even though they had requested that this be kept confidential.

In one case, social workers interrogated a woman about her plans for adoption and lodged an investigation, effectively blocking the adoption.

Even after the woman went to the children’s court, which ordered the department to issue the required documents to finalise the adoption, the department refused.

Judge Fiona Dippenaar found that the guidelines went “beyond what is legislated and are inconsistent in significant ways with the constitution and the act”.

The judge said that voluntary consent to adoption by the biological parents was all that was required. There was no provision for any “investigation” or that family members must be consulted or give consent when the mothers were older than 18.

Dippenaar said the department “has adopted a pattern of conduct” that affected the adoptions of vulnerable children. She ordered that the conduct of the social workers be brought to the attention of the SA Council for Social Service Professions.

However, the social workers were never referred to the council and the adoption services in Gauteng remain under the same management as at the time of the court case.

GroundUp/